Modern Mortician Admin

Why Water Cremains and Flame Cremains

React Differently on Grass and Soil

(image of a vial of water cremains on the left, and flame cremains on the right)


image of a vial of water cremains on the left, and flame cremains on the right


When families choose cremation, whether by flame or water (alkaline hydrolysis), they often imagine scattering ashes as a simple return to nature. But what happens after scattering depends heavily on how those cremains were created. Flame cremains and water cremains look and behave differently because of their chemical composition, texture, and pH balance. Understanding these differences helps families make informed decisions about where, and how, to spread them responsibly.


Flame Cremains: Dry, Alkaline, and Mineral-Heavy


Flame cremation reduces the body to bone fragments through high heat (1400–1800°F). These are then mechanically processed into the fine, sandy powder most people recognize as “ashes.”


  • Composition: Primarily calcium phosphates, carbonates, and trace minerals.


  • pH Level: Strongly alkaline.


  • Texture: Dry, coarse, and gritty.


When spread on grass or soil:


  • The high alkalinity can burn grass or inhibit plant growth by disrupting the soil’s natural balance.


  • Because they don’t dissolve easily, flame cremains can sit on top of soil like a chalky layer.


  • Without dilution or mixing, they can create concentrated “hot spots” that damage lawns or plants.


This is why families are often advised to blend flame cremains with soil amendments (like peat moss, compost, or bio-urn additives) before scattering.


Water Cremains: Softer, Neutralized, and Soil-Friendly


Water cremation, or alkaline hydrolysis, uses a gentle mix of water, heat, and alkaline salts to return the body to bone. The bone fragments are then dried and processed, just like flame cremation, but the outcome is chemically distinct.


  • Composition: Calcium phosphate in a purer, more uniform form.


  • pH Level: Closer to neutral once processed, less caustic to soils.


  • Texture: Softer, finer, almost like powdered chalk.


When spread on grass or soil:


  • Water cremains tend to integrate more easily with the soil.


  • They’re less likely to scorch plants or disrupt microbial life.


  • Families often find them gentler for scattering in gardens, forests, or natural burial grounds.


Because of these qualities, water cremains are often described as the more “earth-friendly” option when considering scattering directly on soil or near vegetation.


Why This Matters:


Many families picture scattering ashes under a favorite tree or in the family garden as a beautiful tribute. But if flame cremains are applied heavily without preparation, the soil may suffer, and plants can die back. Water cremains, on the other hand, are less harsh and tend to harmonize with the environment more naturally.


Best Practices for Scattering Either Type:


  • Mix cremains with topsoil or compost before scattering.


  • Scatter lightly over a wide area rather than concentrating in one spot.


  • For gardens, use a buffering product or planting urn designed to balance pH.


Consider scattering in conservation areas, memorial gardens, or with a green burial provider who can guide you.


In Summary:


Flame cremains are heavier, drier, and more alkaline, which can harm grass or soil without preparation. Water cremains are softer, finer, and more balanced, making them less disruptive to natural environments. Both methods can be meaningful ways to honor a loved one, but knowing the differences ensures that the tribute also nourishes, rather than harms, the earth. - Melissa Meadow


Articles & Sources on Flame vs. Water Cremains

  1. Eternal Tides – Problems with Cremated Remains
    https://www.eternaltidesfmwf.com/blog/cremationproblems3
  2. Be a Tree Cremation – Water vs. Fire Cremation Ashes
    https://www.beatreecremation.com/learn/water-vs-fire-cremation-ashes
  3. Carolina Memorial Sanctuary – Options for Cremated Remains (Green Burial & Scattering)
    https://carolinamemorialsanctuary.org/cremated-remains-options-green-burial-scattering/
  4. Mornington Green – Are Human Ashes Bad for the Environment?
    https://morningtongreen.com.au/are-human-ashes-bad-for-the-environment/
  5. Better Place Forests – Aquamation vs. Cremation
    https://www.betterplaceforests.com/blog/aquamation-vs-cremation/
  6. Endswell Funeral Home – Guide to Alkaline Hydrolysis (Aquamation)
    https://endswellfuneralhome.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-alkaline-hydrolysis-aquamation-a-gentle-and-eco-friendly-alternative-to-cremation/
  7. Wikipedia – Cremation
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cremation
  8. Wikipedia – Water Cremation (Alkaline Hydrolysis)
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_cremation


New Paragraph

green burial california
September 8, 2025
Where to find green/natural burial in California.
green burial arkansas
September 8, 2025
Where to find green/natural burial in Arkansas
arizna green burial
By Modern Mortician Admin September 8, 2025
Where to find green/natural burial in Arizona.
alaska green burial alaska
September 8, 2025
Where to find green/natural burial in Alaska
By Modern Mortician Admin September 8, 2025
Where to find green/natural burial in Alabama
By Kendra Holliday September 1, 2025
A Unique Display- guest post by Kendra Holliday
water cremation, wave urn
By Modern Mortician Admin August 29, 2025
Melissa Meadow explains where to get water cremation in the US
August 19, 2025
🌿 I Get Asked This All the Time: What’s the Greenest Way to Die?
June 18, 2025
The Problem with Funeralocity and similar sites: Why It's Time to Look Elsewhere for Transparent Funeral Planning
By Modern Mortician Admin June 1, 2025
When the “mushroom shroud” first hit the funeral industry, I was intrigued, albeight briefly. A burial garment laced with spores that claimed to neutralize toxins and help decompose the human body faster?  It sounded revolutionary. But I was closer to the mushroom suit than most. I was in the room, so to speak. I watched the marketing balloon inflate, and I saw who benefited. Spoiler alert: it wasn’t the consumer, and it certainly wasn’t the planet. That early mushroom shroud turned out to be more PR than practicality. It relied heavily on the public's love for nature-inspired innovation but had very little transparent science to back up its promises. I didn’t see any peer-reviewed data or detailed decomposition timelines. I saw branding. I saw $$$. I saw hashtags. I saw funerary folklore dressed up as eco-tech. So, yes, my involvement left me deeply skeptical of any product touting mycelium as a miracle solution for green burial. Then came Loop Biotech , with slick design and viral marketing. Their “living cocoon”, a coffin grown from mycelium, was being shared widely across social media, lauded as the future of sustainable burial. It looks futuristic, soft, and gentle...a decomposable cradle for the body. People in my inbox were tagging me constantly, excited by the idea. But once again, I had questions. Loop Biotech is based in the Netherlands. These mushroom coffins, as lovely as they are in theory, are being shipped across oceans to American consumers. That’s not sustainable—that’s greenwashing . When your "eco coffin" travels 3,000+ miles in a box, your carbon footprint isn’t shrinking. It’s just hidden under compostable packaging. It was after a respected casket supplier shared about offering Loop Biotech coffins, that I was then introduced to Setas Mushrooms in the comment section. Quietly working out of Pennsylvania , this small business is making mushroom coffins right here in the U.S. Their approach is humble, local, and genuinely rooted in regenerative design. Setas isn’t trying to dominate the market with buzzwords—they're cultivating solutions, literally. Their coffins are grown, not built, using mycelium and agricultural waste. They’ve focused on keeping things local and sustainable from beginning to end. No flashy campaigns, just a small American company doing the actual work. And that’s what frustrates me. The funeral industry has a habit—whether from laziness, ignorance, or greed—of looking overseas for flashy solutions while ignoring what’s growing in our own backyard. Why are we giving clicks and dollars to Dutch startups when there’s a team in Pennsylvania already offering better, more accessible alternatives? As someone who has spent years fighting for transparency, ethical pricing, and environmental responsibility in deathcare, I’ll say this plainly: If we’re going to go green, let’s go local first. Because compostable doesn’t mean ethical, and biodegradable doesn’t mean better—unless you’ve taken the time to know the source, the science, and the story behind the shroud.